Experience resides in memory, while memory is an unlocatable ghost 'experience' seems to speak of something like an essence. Something must be there. As if the accumulation of memory is meaningful if that accumulated memory is experience, and the meaningful essence of experience will justify the attachment to memory.
What do we have? The clothes on our back? The back on our spines? Our consciousness on our brains, which is moving about and acting through an alien body? Do we even have our consciousness?
We don't properly own anything, and if we can't locate the self in any satisfactory manner, the self is then most likely an evolved construct, purposed to motivate us to care properly. If we care properly about ourselves we won't just let our bodies or our material assets parish. Reasonable, one might say.
But then the eternal question: why do I care so much? With my clothes and my back and my spine and my brain and my restless restless mind?
So is experience isn't ours; it's lack of self grates against our illusory sense of self which is only a concept that we allow to be.
Why care so much when it hurts?
What do we have? The clothes on our back? The back on our spines? Our consciousness on our brains, which is moving about and acting through an alien body? Do we even have our consciousness?
We don't properly own anything, and if we can't locate the self in any satisfactory manner, the self is then most likely an evolved construct, purposed to motivate us to care properly. If we care properly about ourselves we won't just let our bodies or our material assets parish. Reasonable, one might say.
But then the eternal question: why do I care so much? With my clothes and my back and my spine and my brain and my restless restless mind?
So is experience isn't ours; it's lack of self grates against our illusory sense of self which is only a concept that we allow to be.
Why care so much when it hurts?